Buy premium account for $1.99 ($3.99)

Results for: apocalypse 12

Create alert

Results 1 - 10 of 82 (found in 0.249s)

Jimi Tenor - Year of the apocalypse

2009-12-23 - extension: rar - size: 23 MB

Jimi Tenor - Year of the apocalypse

Hosted on: rapidshare.com

| Source: http://somerapidsharelinks.blogspot.com/2009/12/jimi-tenor-year-of-apocalypse.html

Save to quick list - Download

Public Enemy-Apocalypse 91 The Enemy Strikes Black-Retail-1991-Recycled INT

2009-11-23 - extension: rar - size: 74 MB

Public Enemy-Apocalypse 91 The Enemy Strikes Black-Retail-1991-Recycled INT

Public Enemy Discography (12 albums)

Hosted on: rapidshare.com

| Source: http://www.freshwap.net/forums/music/474454-public-enemy-discography-12-albums.html

Save to quick list - Download

L Effet C Est Moi 2009 - Les Voix De L Apocalypse - 320kbps

2009-12-16 - extension: rar - size: 106 MB

L Effet C Est Moi 2009 - Les Voix De L Apocalypse - 320kbps

Hosted on: rapidshare.com

| Source: http://in-the-mouth-of-madness.blogspot.com/2009/12/leffet-cest-moi-2009-les-voix-de-l.html

Save to quick list - Download

Video results for: apocalypse 12More results from video

p6apclps #80 Perl 6 Apocalypse
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6 - - well here, and I'm wondering if it will be too hard to (More) http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl6 - - well here, and I'm wondering if it will be too hard to explain in general. I think this is probably too powerful a concept for the typical Perl programmer, who is lucky to understand simple lvalues that always do what they're told. This sort of matching can probably be provided as syntactic warpage, though I'm not sure if that prevents useful optimizations. Anyway, this sort of thing is unlikely to make it into the Perl 6 core unless it generalizes usefully to function argument lists, and it may be too powerful for there too. For that purpose it would resemble a form of overloading, but with the "types" specified by keys. I suspect real types are more useful. RFC 308: Ban Perl hooks into regexes We must be able to call back into Perl code if we want to write parsers conveniently in Perl. Think of how yacc works. Certainly the way that Perl 5 does it is ugly, I'll admit. We can beautify that. But the whole point of Perl is to have all the most useful "Krakken tentacles". And I don't really care if it makes it hard to put the Perl regex engine into some other language. ":-)" RFC 316: Regex modifier for support of chunk processing and prefix matching Infinite strings (via infinite arrays) seem like a more useful concept. It would be easy for the extension subroutine to fail and produce the results desired in this RFC, but without the necessity of the extra syntax specified by the RFC. A match naturally fails when it gets to the end of its string without finishing the pattern. Incremental matching can also easily be done via infinite strings, and the user interface can be a simple as we like, as long as extension rule is somehow associated with the string in question. I think "pos()" is rather too low-level a concept for general use. Certainly it needs to be there, but I think we need some way of implying that one regex is a continuation of a previous one, but within some higher-level syntactic construct, so that it's easy to write parsers without invoking "pos()" or "\g" or "/ c" all over the place. [Update: That turns out to be the ":p" modifier.] "[cut]" Well, I could say a lot more, but that's it for this time. I hope you're excited by all this, in a positive sort of way. But if your jaw lost all of its bounce when it hit the table, I expect Damian's upcoming Exegesis 5 will do a better job of showing how this all fits together into a pretty picture. NAME Apocalypse_06 - Subroutines AUTHOR Larry Wall [larry@wall.org] VERSION Maintainer: Larry Wall [larry@wall.org] Date: 7 Mar 2003 Last Modified: 25 May 2006 Number: 6 Version: 6 This is the Apocalypse on Subroutines. In Perl culture the term "subroutine" conveys the general notion of calling something that returns control automatically when it's done. This "something" that you're calling may go by a more specialized name such as "procedure", "function", "closure", or "method". In Perl 5, all such subroutines were declared using the keyword "sub" regardless of their specialty. For readability, Perl 6 will use alternate keywords to declare special subroutines, but they're still essentially the same thing underneath. Insofar as they all behave similarly, this Apocalypse will have something to say about them. (And if we also leak a few secrets about how method calls work, that will make Apocalypse 12 all the easier--presuming we don't have to un-invent anything between now and then...) Here are the RFCs covered in this Apocalypse. PSA stands for "problem, solution, acceptance", my private rating of how this RFC will fit into Perl 6. I note that none of the RFCs achieved unreserved acceptance this time around. Maybe I'm getting picky in my old age. Or maybe I just can't incorporate anything into Perl without "marking" it... RFC PSA Title --- --- ----- 21 abc Subroutines: Replace C[wantarray] with a generic C[want] function 23 bcc Higher order functions 57 abb Subroutine prototypes and parameters 59 bcr Proposal to utilize C[*] as the prefix to magic subroutines 75 dcr structures and interface definitions 107 adr lvalue subs should receive the rvalue as an argument 118 rrr lvalue subs: parameters, explicit assignment, and wantarray() changes 128 acc Subroutines: Extend subroutine contexts to include name parameters and lazy arguments 132 acr Subroutines should be able to return an lvalue 149 adr Lvalue subroutines: implicit and explicit assignment 154 bdr Simple assignment lvalue subs (Less)