Results for: skyscrapers pdf
D3D-Skyscrapers.pdf 
2008-05-06 - extension: pdf - size: 818 KB
D3D-Skyscrapers.pdf
No description saved
Hosted on: rapidshare.com
Video results for: skyscrapers pdfMore results from video 
Crazy Conspiracy Theories part 2 of 2 part 2 more links (they wouln't all fit in the first part): Even more links (and some (More) part 2 more links (they wouln't all fit in the first part): Even more links (and some repeats), for my response to benedictrove: http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/news/stories/2007/twin_towers/ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6987965.stm http://www.newkerala.com/july.php?action=fullnews&id=59014 http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/12/alqaeda.911.claim/ http://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/1216 http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html http://www.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/B951685F-EDF8-4256-8549-00D72246FDC3.htm (ok, so I don't actually know what that one said, but it looks like it supports me. Translation, anyone?) another anti-conspiracy thing: http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,265160,00.html early reports of mistaken identity: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1559151.stm http://www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk/Web%20Pages/LOS%20ANGELES%20TIMES_FBI%20Chief%20Raises%20New%20Doubts%20Over%20Hijackers'%20Identities.htm http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/27/inv.suspects/ BUT, here's the follow-up: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/911_conspiracy_theory_1.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3917703.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/guides/456900/456983/html/default.stm http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/05/conspiracy_theories.html Oh, and another reminder about WTC 7: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_World_Trade_Center#Collapse And some criticism of conspiracy thinking: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories#Criticism This site is really good: http://www.debunking911.com/ http://www.debunking911.com/quick.htm And other random links, for no reason: http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffith1/refute.htm http://www.history.com/shows.do?action=detail&episodeId=240087 Is that enough for you? I'm starting to realize that debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories is a full-time job. There are so many theories that it's practically impossible to address them all. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11%2C_2001_timeline_for_the_day_of_the_attacks http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/01/27/911.commis.call/ http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB196/doc03.pdf http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2004_rpt/staff_statement_17.pdf http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/Roberts_AnnotatedJones-RobertsonTranscript.pdf http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/Eagar/Eagar-0112.html http://www.asce.org/responds/ http://www.asce.org/pressroom/news/display_press.cfm?uid=1057 http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/hayden.html http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch1.pdf http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch2.pdf http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch3.pdf http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch4.pdf http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch5.pdf http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch6.pdf http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch7.pdf http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_ch8.pdf (note: parts of the fema report were later constested by the more-detailed NIST repot. But both reports had similar conclusions, i.e. the Controlled Demolition makes no sense at all) http://wtc.nist.gov/WTC%20Response%20Presentation%2011122002%20text.pdf http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2001/skyscrapers.html http://web.mit.edu/civenv/wtc/ http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/n02-14.htm http://www.civil.northwestern.edu/people/bazant/PDFs/Papers/466.pdf http://wtc.nist.gov/oct05NCSTAR1-6index.htm http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6987965.stm http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/fire/dalmarnock.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/broadband/tx/firegrid/ (Less)
HUMANS SHOULDN'T HAVE PUPPIES!! EDIT: Nope, tried to upload it as a single video, and youtube still rejected it. Guess even director (More) EDIT: Nope, tried to upload it as a single video, and youtube still rejected it. Guess even director accounts still need to be under ten minutes e.e
Well, here's part one, I'll list part two as a video response once this one is up.
Heh, I'm already looking forward to all the incoherent hate mail I'm going to get from idiots who only read the title and don't bother to watch the video. Also, this'll be the first time I try to upload a video longer than ten minutes since I changed to a director account, we'll see if it works.
Linkage time:
The Yahoo! News article about the mom of the octuplets, Nadya Suleman- http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090131/ap_on_re_us/octuplets
World Population Prospects report where I got the info about various country's infant mortality rates- http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2006/WPP2006_Highlights_rev.pdf
Review of the book I mention, Robert Silverbeg's "The World Inside," which presents a pretty grisly view of the world if the philosophy of religious fervor and overpopulation continues- http://scifistandpoint.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/silverbergian-skyscrapers-and-the-world-inside-them/
Now, let the religious zealot and hater flaming begin! :D (Less)
Bookmark FilesTube
Link to FilesTube
Show your support by placing a link to filestube.com on your website and favorite forums.
