Buy premium account for $1.99 ($3.99)

Results for: vdr

Create alert

Results 1 - 10 of 150 (found in 0.115s)

Tatsaechlich Liebe

2009-12-22 - extension: vdr - size: 40 MB

Tatsaechlich Liebe

Hosted on: rapidshare.com

| Source: http://rapidshare.com/users/LEY5DZ

Save to quick list - Download

Jeannette Biedermann Bowling

2009-12-22 - extension: vdr - size: 39 MB

Jeannette Biedermann Bowling

Hosted on: rapidshare.com

| Source: http://rapidshare.com/users/LEY5DZ

Save to quick list - Download

Tanja Szewczenko

2009-12-22 - extension: vdr - size: 42 MB

Tanja Szewczenko

Hosted on: rapidshare.com

| Source: http://rapidshare.com/users/LEY5DZ

Save to quick list - Download

Video results for: vdrMore results from video

Le bêtisier du journal de VDR TV
Le bêtisier du faux journal du 26 avril 2007 de VDR TV (séquences loupées, (More)

Watch here

Testing my Panasonic VDR-D300
Testing my new Camcorder Panasonic VDR-D300, It's very good but I had problems to vonvert to (More) Testing my new Camcorder Panasonic VDR-D300, It's very good but I had problems to vonvert to AVI. These software has been used for this video: *FlasKMPEG: convert VRO to AVI *Windows Movie Maker: add some effects. *DVD-RAM disc: record the video. The good: Decent low-light performance; vibrant color; solid battery life; acceptable still quality. The bad: Optical zoom is only 10X; no analog input; no video light. The bottom line: Rivaling its MiniDV competitors in a variety of shooting conditions, the Panasonic VDR-D300 doesn't force you to compromise video quality for the convenience of shooting directly on DVD. Image quality of Panasonic VDR-D300 The Panasonic VDR-D300's image quality is among the best that we've seen in a consumer DVD camcorder. Image sharpness is above average for a DVD camcorder, approaching that of MiniDV cameras such as Panasonic's PV-GS65. We noticed far fewer video-compression artifacts typical of DVD-based units. Outdoors, video looked very good, with accurate, saturated color and no visible chromatic aberration or color fringing. The only noticeable visual oddities were some very subtle jagged edges we saw when we zoomed in tight on rounded objects. Indoors, the three CCDs come into play to offer far better color in low-light situations than you'd get with single-CCD cameras. In dimly lit rooms, there was noticeable graininess in the footage, but color remained accurate and saturated down to a light level where most single-CCD cameras would be displaying a gray, muddy image. Only when lighting conditions were closer to dark than dim did we see a significant loss of color. The MagicPix mode attempts to compensate for this by lowering shutter speed, but it's mostly useful for still subjects due to blurring of moving objects. Still images had good color but lacked sharpness in heavily textured areas. In particular, indoor shots with flash had a noticeably fuzzy quality to them. Overall, still quality is decent--acceptable for candid shooting, but you wouldn't want to use it as your primary still camera if you plan to make larger prints. Check it out: http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-camcorders/panasonic-vdr-d300/4505-6500_7-31660692.html?ar=o&tag=pdtl-list (Less)

Watch here